Cant Construction Ltd. signed a contract with a homeowner for the construction of a house. The hors not built in accordance with the contract, so the homeowner sued Cant seeking damages. The homeowner was successful in getting a judgement against Cant, but found that Cant has insufficient assets to satisfy the judgment as it regularly transferred its cash to its parent company 121563 Ontario Limited. Can the homeowner collect from 121563 Ontario Limited? Yes, according to the doctrine of promissory estoppel No, according to the parol evidence rule. Yes, this is a statutory novation Yes, according to the Statute of Frauds No, according to the doctrine of Internet connection lost. No longer saving answers