Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Capital Rationing Decision Involving Four Proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

Capital Rationing Decision Involving Four Proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Project Name Sierra Tango Uniform Victor Investment $900,000 Investment $2,479,195 Investment $1,566,680 Investment $1,040,013 Income Income Net Cash Net Cash Net Cash Income from Operations Net Cash Flows from from Income from Operations Year Flows Flows Flows Operations Operations 1 $96,000 $240,000 $263,500 $850,000 $184,000 $400,000 $109,000 $390,000 2 96,500 240,000 263,775 850,000 184,000 400,000 109,000 390,000 3 97,000 240,000 264,050 850,000 184,000 400,000 109,000 390,000 4 97,500 240,000 264,325 850,000 184,000 400,000 109,000 390,000 390,000 5 98,000 240,000 264,600 850,000 184,000 400,000 109,000 Total $485,000 $1,200,000 $1,320,250 $4,250,000 $920,000 $2,000,000 $545,000 $1,950,000 Present Value of $1 at Compound Interest Year 6% 10% 12% 15% 20% 1 0.943 0.909 0.893 0.870 0.833 2 0.890 0.826 0.797 0.756 0.694 3 0.840 0.751 0.712 0.658 0.579 4 0.792 0.683 0.636 0.572 0.482 5 0.747 0.621 0.567 0.497 0.402 Present Value of $1 at Compound Interest Year 6% 10% 12% 15% 20% 1 0.943 0.909 0.893 0.870 0.833 2 0.890 0.826 0.797 0.756 0.694 3 3 0.840 0.751 0.712 0.658 0.579 4 0.792 0.683 0.636 0.572 0.482 5 0.747 0.621 0.567 0.497 0.402 6 0.705 0.564 0.507 0.432 0.335 7 0.665 0.513 0.452 0.376 0.279 8 0.627 0.467 0.404 0.327 0.233 9 0.592 0.424 0.361 0.284 0.194 10 0.558 0.386 0.322 0.247 0.162 The company's capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average rate of return of 20% is required on all projects. If the preceding standards are met, the net present value method and present value indexes are used to rank the remaining proposals. Required: 1. Compute the cash payback period for each of the four proposals. Assume that net cash flows are uniform throughout the year. Cash Payback Period Proposal Sierra 3 years 9 months Proposal Tango 2 years 11 months Proposal Uniform 3 years 11 months Proposal Victor 2 years 8 months 2. Giving effect to straight-line depreciation on the investments and assuming no estimated residual value, compute the average rate of return for each of the four proposals. Round to one decimal place. Average Rate of Return Proposal Sierra % Proposal Tango % Proposal Uniform % Proposal Victor % 3. Using the results from parts (1) and (2) determine which proposals should be accepted for further analysis and which should be rejected. Accept / Reject Proposal Sierra Reject Proposal Tango Accept for further analysis Proposal Uniform Reject Proposal Victor Accept for further analysis 4. For the proposals accepted for further analysis in part (3), compute the net present value. Use a rate of 12% and the present value of $1 table above. If required, use the minus sign to indicate a subtraction or negative net present value. Select the proposal accepted for further analysis. Proposal Tango Proposal Victor Present value of net cash flow total Amount to be invested Net present value 5. Compute the present value index for each of the proposals in part (4). Round to two decimal places. Select the proposal to compute present value index. Proposal Tango Proposal Victor Present value index (rounded) 6. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present values of net cash flows computed in part (4). Rank 1st Proposal Tango Rank 2nd Proposal Victor 7. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present value indexes computed in part (5). Rank 1st Proposal Victor Rank 2nd Proposal Tango 8. Based on your calculations above, complete the statements below. Looking at the present value computations, Proposal Tango has the larger net present value. Proposal Victor is attractive in terms of amount of present value per dollar invested. Comparing the two proposals, their present value indices have a moderate range . Lastly, Proposal Tango has the larger initial investment. Considering all this information, Kopecky should proceed with Proposal Victor Feedback Check My Work (1) For each project, start with Year 1 and accumulate the net cash flows until the initial investment is reached. (2) Divide the estimated average annual income by the average investment. (3) Determine which proposals meet the payback requirements and the minimum average rate of return

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Principles Of Accounting

Authors: Steven M. Bragg

1st Edition

1642210773, 978-1642210774

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

How do emotions affect peoples relationship with money?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

develop ideas for a research project;

Answered: 1 week ago