Carlson negotiates with Erin to purchase Erin's laptop. Erin tells Carlson that the laptop is gently used, and only one year old. Instead, the laptop is five years old and the battery is failing. Carlson does not know this, and Carlson agrees to pay $2,000 for Erin's laptop. Erin owes Faith money and assigns the $2,000 Carlson owes for the laptop to Faith. When Carlson discovers Erin's misrepresentation of the condition of the laptop, Carlson refuses to pay the $2,000. May Faith enforce the contract and demand that Carlson pay Faith $2,000? Yes, because Faith did not misrepresent the condition of the laptop. Yes, because Erin owed Faith $2,000. No, because an assignment of debt such as this is not valid. No, because Faith's rights are subject to the defenses Carlson had against Erin