Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

CASE #1 Orestes was employed as the manager of Coral Gables Horse Farm. a business carried on by Coral Gables Inc. Orestes was responsible for

CASE #1

Orestes was employed as the manager of Coral Gables Horse Farm. a business carried on by Coral Gables Inc. Orestes was responsible for the day-to-day operations of the farm, including the care and \maintenance of the horses and the management of the staff. Calum owned all the shares in the corporation and was the sole director and officer of Coral Gables Inc. He was the only one who had authority to buy new horses. In January, Calum asked Orestes to go to the local horse dealer and buy two stallions. Orestes bought the horses. Orestes thought that he had been given a general authority to buy horses for the farm, but that was not Calum's intention. In February, Orestes went to the horse dealer without Calum's permission and purported to buy from the horse dealer two more stallions on behalf of the corporation. When the horse dealer delivered the horses and asked for payment, Calum refused.Can the horse dealer enforce the contract? If not, does the horse dealer have any other remedy?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Introduction To Business Law

Authors: Jeff Rey F. Beatty, Susan S. Samuelson

3rd Edition

978-0324826999, 0324826990

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

What is meant by managing paradox and contradiction?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Q.No.1 Explain Large scale map ? Q.No.2 Explain small scale map ?

Answered: 1 week ago