Case Study 4 – Faulty Construction Equipment. An inspector discovers faulty construction equipment and applies a violation tag, preventing its continued use. The inspector’s supervisor, a construction manager, views the case as a minor infraction of safety regulations and orders the tag removed so the project will not be delayed.

What is the moral dilemma(s), if any? Clearly express the ‘competing’ moral reasons involved.

What ‘factual’ inquiries (i.e., facts/evidence) might be needed in making a reliable judgment about the case?

What should she do to fulfill her professional responsibility?