CASE STUDY COMPARING SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS Background spousal benefits and start his own. In the meantime, his ben efits will have increased by 24% Of course, this strategy Sheryl When Sheryl graduated from Northeastern University in 2000 and went to work for BAE Systems, she did not pay much attention to the monthly payroll deduction for social It was a "necessary evil" that may be helpful in re- tirement years. However, this was so far in the future that she fully expected this govemment retirement benefit system to could be switched with Brad taking his benefits and receiving spousal benefits until age 70 All these options led them to define four alternative plans A: Each takes early benefits at age 62 with a 30% red tion to $1400 per month and receives $2000 per month to $2480 per month. be broke and gone by the time she could reap any benefits Each takes full benefits at full retirement age of 67 from her years of contributions. This year, Sheryl and Brad, another engineer at BAE C: Each delays benefits until age 70 with a 24% increase got married. Recently. they both received notices from the Social Security Administration of their potential retirement amounts, were they to retire and start social security bene- fits at preset ages. Since both of them hope to retire a few years early, they decided to pay closer attention to the pre- dicted amount of retirement benefits and to do some analy D: One person takes full benefits of $2000 per month at age 67, and the other person receives spousal benefits (S1000 per month at age 67) and switches to delayed benefits of $2480 at age 70 sis on the numbers. They realize, of course, that the numbers will change over time, based on their respective salaries and number of years of contribution to the social security system by them and by Information their employers. They found that their projected benefits are substantially the same, which makes sense since their salaries are very close to in their two mailings, the similar messages to Brad and Shery each other. Although Case Study Exercises the numbers were slightly different Brad and Sheryl are the same age. Brad determined that most Of their investments make an average of 6% per year. With this as the interest rate, the analysis for the four alternatives is possible. Sheryl and Brad plan to answer the following ques tions, but don't have time this week. Can you please help time, not the cou- can be summarized as follows: If you stop working and start receiving benefits... At age 62, your payment would be about S1400 per month At you full retirement age (67 years), your payment would be them? (Do the analysis for one person at a ple, and stop at the age of 85.) S2000 per month 1. 2, 3 4. How much in total (without the time value of money con- sidered) will each plan A through D pay through age 857 What is the future worth at 6% per year of each plan at At age 70, your payment would be about $2480 per month age 85? These numbers represent a reduction of30% for earlyre tirement (age 62) and an increase of 24% for delayed retire. Plot the future worth values for all four plans on one spreadsheet graph. ment (age 70) Economically, what is the best combination of plans for Brad and Sheryl, assuming they both live to be 85 years This couple also learned that it is possible for a spouse to take spousal benefits at the time that one of them is at full retirement age. In other words, if Sheryl starts her $2000 ben- efit at age 67, Brad can receive a benefit equal to 50% of hers. Then, when Brad reaches 70 years of age, he can discontinue 5. Develop at least one additional question that you think Sheryl and Brad may have. Answer the