Casey is on trial under criminal allegations that she engage in fraudulent behavior at the company she manages. She is worried when the plaintiff alleges that it has an "unambiguous proof" that Casey is guilty. Which of the following is most likely true?

A.) If the plaintiff provides proof only up to the level of "clear and convincing" Casey can still be acquitted.

B.) if the plaintiff does have an unambiguous evidence that meets a "clear and convincing" burden of proof, Casey will most likely be found guilty.

C.) The plaintiff will most likely prove Casey is guilty, since criminal charges only need to be a prima facie burden of proof.

D. Casey need not worry about the plaintiffs evidence, since parties tend to boast about the level of proof they can establish anyway.