Chuck owns a retail store. The floor of the store is checked 4 times a day and there are many spot cleanups during the course of the day. In fact, the majority of Chuck's time is spent touring the store to ensure, among other things, that the floors are clear. However, 15 minutes after the last complete floor check, Manjit slips on a small hard-coated candy lying on the floor of the store. Manjit sues Chuck. Which of the following statements is TRUE?

1. (1)Because Chuck is aware of the danger created by objects lying on the floor, he is liable for Manjit's injuries.
2. (2)By entering the store, Manjit has willingly accepted the risk that she might fall and therefore is not protected by the provisions of the Occupiers Liability Act.
3. (3)Chuck may be protected by the Occupiers Liability Act because his housekeeping provisions are reasonably intended to prevent this type of injury.
4. (4)All of the above