Civil Law

Privative Clause

Independent contractor

BFOQ

Responden$1$

Act

Reprisal

Legal Precedent

Reasonable Accommodation

Indefinite.

Administrative Tribunals

Contra Proferentem

Restrictive Covenant

Notwithstanding clause

Ancillary Contract

Undue hardship

Conditional Job offer

Implied term

Solicitor$-$client privilege

Constructive Discrimination

Francine is a self$-$employed HR consultant.

Kim's employment contract includes a clause whereby he agrees not to solicit the

employer's customers for six months after he leaves that employment

The party opposing an appeal.

Sonia is not required to divulge confidential communications with her lawyer that she

disclosed for the purpose of getting legal advice.

A requirement that a cab driver must have a driver's license.

The employer fires the employee for filing a human rights complaint.

The employer modifies the company car so Philip, who was recently disabled, can still

drive it$.$

Maia is hired on a permanent, rather than a temporary, basis and this means that she is

a

hire.

Ruies containeo in vanous handbooks, etc. that govern the workplace, and which are

included as part of the employment contract if referred to as such within the

employment contract.

The employment contract does not contain a termination provision so Shady is entitled

to reasonable notice of termination.

Bodies created by statute to offer an alternative to the court system.

Previous decisions by judges that looked at similar issues.

The employer offers Sheila the job, subject to her taking a pre$-$employment medical

examination.

Height and weight requirement for a job.

Law that applies to private, non$-$criminal matters.

The principle whereby if a term in a contract is ambiguous $($i$.$e$.$ can have more than one

meaning$),$ courts will interpret that term in favour of the party who did not draft it$.$

Another name for "statute".

A statutory provision that limits the ability to appeal the decision of an administrative

tribunal to the courts.

Where accommodating someone with a disability would substantially affect the viability

of the organization.

It protects legislation from a charter of Rights challenge as long as the legislation

expressly contains it$.$