coches will cole in that it wys wie sitive Problemler interfonische werelem mind what handel Project 1.200 1.200 600 410 400 30 100 2 210 What You Wote de What the cance of the to the after this part when werden Review the test the NDV Pro NV Pro NOV 600 000 w 900 DO 300 200 LO 2009 200 100 20 100 30 500 300 300 Na proto OD 1064 Quantitative Problem: Bellinger Industries is considering two projects for inclusion operating working capital requirements, and tax effects are all included in these cash 0 1 2 3 4 600 400 300 Project A Project B -1,200 -1,200 230 210 410 330 740 What is Project Delta's IRR? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answ % What is the significance of this IRR? It is the select after this point when mutually exclusive projects are conside Review the graphs below. Select the graph that correctly represents the correct NPVP -Select- NPV Profiles A INPV 5 6004 5001 NPV (5) 6001 5001 400 400 300 3007 200 200 100 3 100- 5 5 10 01 20 25 30 -100 con of Capital -200 -300 -4001 -1001 -2001 -300 -4001 NPV Profiles D INPV 5 600 500 400 300 200 1001 ed in these cash flows. Both projects have 4-year lives, and they have risk characteristics simi Round your answer to two decimal places. projects are considered there is no conflict in project acceptance between the NPV and IRR approach Es the correct NPV profile for Projects A and B by using the following drop down menu. NPV Profiles B NPV Pro NPV S 600 NPV (5) 600+ 500 500 400 400 300 300 200 - 200 100 Ot. 100 5 10 -100 20 25 30 20 -100 -200 Cost of Gapeals -200 -300+ -4001 -300 -4001 ysis. Both projects' after-tax cash flows are shown on the time line below. Depreciation, salvage values, n aracteristics similar to the firm's average project. Bellinger's WACC is 10%. NPV and IRR approaches. yn menu NPV Profiles C INPV 5 20 25 30 Cost of Captal