COLLAPSE Based on my understanding, the freedom of speech protected by the 1st and 14th amendments would protect the student's right to call the professor "a frigging Nazi." However, when the student threatened the professor, the 1st and 14th Amendments would not protect the student. The student was removed from the classroom. It's important to note that the student's First Amendment right is not violated when the student's speech poses a danger or has malicious intent behind it. This means that the student's speech, when seeking to cause harm or with malicious intent, is not protected under the 1st Amendment freedom of speech. Removing the student from the classroom was not a violation of their First Amendment rights. In the case of Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell (1988), the Supreme Court reinforced the principle that the First Amendment protects even highly offensive and outrageous speech, as long as it does not meet the high standard of actual malice required for public figures to claim damages. In the case of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942), the Supreme Court established the concept of "fighting words," affirming that certain types of name-calling and offensive speech are not protected under the First Amendment. This