combine this different rule statements into one: "The Park Is Not Liable in Negligence for Ms. Monroe's Broken Nose, Because Liability for Negligence Depends on the Circumstances, and Deliberate Frightening of People, Which at Other Times Might Be a Negligent Breach of the Defendant's Duty, Is Not So Within a Haunted House Attraction or on Halloween. " 2) The Park Is Not Liable in Negligence for Ms. Monroe's Broken Nose, Because Liability for Negligence Depends on the Circumstances, and Deliberate Frightening of People, Which at Other Times Might Be a Negligent Breach of the Defendant's Duty, Is Not So Within a Haunted House Attraction or on Halloween. 3) The plaintiff, by voluntarily entering the haunted house, relieved the operators of the duty to guard against patrons reacting in bizarre, frightened, or unpredictable ways; and there was no breach of the duty of care by Franklin Flags Amusement Park when its staff member dressed up as a zombie and frightening the Plaintiff. 4) Because Franklin Flags Amusement Park adequately provided supervision and safety personnel beyond the duty required by law, the Defendant is not liable to the Plaintiff for her unpredictable reaction inside the Haunted House and is entitled to summary judgment on her claim for damages for her broken nose