Comment briefly on the data presented in Figure 9 of male (n=4) and female (n=3) EXSC 415 students from Fall 2022 measured by Styku Infrared, BODPOD/Siri, HSW/Siri, InBody BEI, IGIRTH, Sloan/Siri, and JP(W)/Siri methods and the results of the statistical analysis presented below. In general, how do the Sloan and JP(w) skinfold methods compare to other methods? (1 pt.) Figure 9. Comparison of methodologies to estimate %fat in EXSC 415 Fall 2022 subjects (n=4 females, n=4 males). Values are MeanSE. 40.0 38.0 36.0 34.0 Estimated % Fat 32.0 30.0 28.0 26.0 24.0 22.0 2010 18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 SKYKU IR BODPOD Overall Mean across Method and Gender Method: F=6.131, p InBody (24.03.2%), HSW (23.32.8%), 1GIRTH (21.8+2.5%), SLOAN (16.42.1%), JP(W) (15.62.6%) InBody=HSW=1GIRTH=SLOAN=JP(W) Female: Styku = BODPOD = InBody> HSW, 1GIRTH. SLOAN. JP(W) Male: Styku = HSW = BODPOD = InBody> IGIRTH. SLOAN. JP(W) Female (29.2+3.3%) > Male (14.23.3%)