Consider how Clare Valley, a popular ski resort, could use capital budgeting to decide whether the $8.5 million Waterfall Park Lodge expansion would be a good investment. (Click the icon to view the expansion estimates.) (Click the icon to view the present value annuity factor table.) (Click the icon to view the future value annuity factor table.) Read the requirements. (Click the icon to view the present value factor table.) (Click the icon to view the future value factor table.) Requirement 1. What is the project's NPV? Is the investment attractive? Why or why not? Calculate the net present value of the expansion. (Round your answer to the nearest whole dollar. Use parentheses or a minus sign for a negative net present value.) Net present value of expansion Is the investment attractive? Why? The expansion is an attractive $ 1,344,910 project because its NPV is positive Requirement 2. Assume the expansion has no residual value. What is the project's NPV? Is the investment still attractive? Why or why not? Calculate the project's NPV. (Round your answer to the nearest whole dollar. Use parentheses or a minus sign for a negative net present value.) Net present value of expansion Data table Assume that Clare Valley's managers developed the following estimates concerning a planned expansion to its Waterfall Park Lodge (all numbers assumed): Number of additional skiers per day....... 119 Average number of days per year that weather conditions allow skiing at Clare Valley. 165 Useful life of expansion (in years) 8 Average cash spent by each skier per day...... Average variable cost of serving each skier per day . $ Cost of expansion.. Discount rate.... Assume that Clare Valley uses the straight-line depreciation method and expects the lodge expansion to have a residual value of $800,000 at the end of its eight-year life. It has already calculated the average annual net cash inflow per year to be $2,061,675. 247 142 $ 8,500,000 14% Print Done