critique the following two essays. add comments or suggestions to how to better the papers to the two essays.

Project Part One: Collection of Sources

The purpose of my research is to investigate how stepping outside our comfort zones unveils solutions through diverse perspectives. The worlds most pressing challenges, from climate control to income inequality, demand a nuanced understanding that transcends personal beliefs. To find effective solutions, we must delve into opinions and ideas that differ from our own. This essay will explore how investigating diverse perspectives strengthens research, analyze the need for a refined research question, and ultimately argue for a complex stance that embraces the richness of these viewpoints.

Lets begin with engaging with contrasting viewpoints fosters a more comprehensive understanding of the challenge. By analyzing arguments against our established beliefs, we expose hidden assumptions and biases in our own thinking. For example, researching climate change solely through the lens of environmental impact ignores the economic concerns of communities reliant on fossil fuels. Examining opposing viewpoints, like the economic hardship of transitioning to renewable energy, allows for a more balanced and robust approach to tackling the issue.

Secondly, diverse perspectives can spark innovation. When confronted with conflicting ideas, we are forced to re-evaluate our own solutions and consider alternative approaches. For instance, research into poverty alleviation might traditionally focus on economic growth.

However, the initial research question often needs to be broadened to fully benefit from diverse perspectives. A question like "What is the best way to combat climate change?" might be too restrictive. Instead, a question like "How can we achieve a sustainable future while considering the economic and social needs of various communities?" encourages exploration of diverse viewpoints. This reframing allows for the research to encompass a wider range of solutions and potential trade-offs.

This refined research question offers itself to a complex stance on the topic. Rather than advocating for a single, rigid solution, the answer lies in acknowledging the strength and weakness of different approaches, ultimately creating a mixed strategy. This stance requires a critical analysis of sources from various perspectives, including scientific studies, economic reports, and social analyses. By synthesizing this information, we can create evidence-based solutions that consider the multifaceted nature of global challenges.

Including sources with diverse perspectives is crucial because it prevents research from becoming an echo chamber. Studies have shown that confirmation bias, the tendency to favor information that confirms pre-existing beliefs, can hinder progress. By incorporating viewpoints that challenge our own, we guard against falling prey to this bias and ensure our research is grounded in a more objective understanding of the issue.

In conclusion, investigating opinions and ideas that differ from our own is an essential step in tackling the worlds most pressing challenges. This exploration not only strengthens our understanding of the issues but also fosters innovation by sparking new solutions. By adopting complex stance that acknowledges the value of diverse perspectives and incorporating sources that represent this range of viewpoints, we can move closer to finding effective solutions to the complex problems that plague our world.

Project Part Two: Persuasive Essay With Research

James Milne

Southern New Hampshire University

ENG 190: Research and Persuasion

April 12, 2024

Project Part Two: Persuasive Essay With Research

Technology's influence on our lives is undeniable, and the workplace is no exception. While advancements offer the potential for a healthier work-life balance, the specter of automation looms large, threatening job security and potentially harming mental well-being. While technology can undoubtedly enhance work-life balance, the potential for widespread job displacement due to automation necessitates a multifaceted approach that prioritizes human welfare alongside technological progress.

On the surface, technology presents a compelling case for a better work-life equilibrium. Cloud-based platforms and collaboration tools allow employees to work remotely, blurring the geographical boundaries of the traditional office. A study by the International Remote Work Association found that remote workers experience increased job satisfaction and report feeling less stressed [1]. Automation also tackles repetitive tasks, freeing up human workers to focus on more strategic and fulfilling endeavors. This can lead to more engaging work experience, potentially reducing burnout.

However, the perceived convenience of technology often comes at a mental cost. The constant "on-call" mentality fostered by smartphones and email creates a sense of never truly disconnecting. A report by Indeed found that 60% of employees check work emails outside of work hours, blurring the lines between professional and personal lives [2]. This lack of clear boundaries can lead to chronic stress and anxiety, impacting mental well-being. Furthermore, the fear of job displacement due to automation can be a significant source of anxiety, hindering productivity and overall satisfaction.

The potential for job losses due to automation cannot be downplayed. A 2017 study by McKinsey Global Institute estimates that up to 800 million jobs could be lost globally by 2030 due to automation [3]. While some argue that new jobs will be created, the skills required for these positions may not be readily transferable for displaced workers. This can lead to significant economic hardship and a decline in overall well-being.

In conclusion, technology's impact on work-life balance is a complex issue. While it offers potential benefits in terms of flexibility and efficiency, the constant connectivity it fosters can ultimately harm mental health. The significant risk of job displacement due to automation further undermines the argument that technology's positive impacts outweigh its negative ones. Moving forward, a focus on developing policies that address the reskilling of workers and promote digital wellness programs is crucial to ensure that technology truly serves the well-being of both individuals and the workforce as a whole.

References

[1] International Remote Work Association. (n.d.).Benefits of remote work. Retrieved fromhttps://remote.com/blog/remote-work-benefits-for-employers

[2] Indeed. (2022, March 17).State of the Remote Work Nation. Retrieved fromhttps://www.flexjobs.com/blog/post/exploring-the-impact-of-remote-work-on-mental-health-and-the-workplace/

[3] McKinsey Global Institute. (2017, January 11).Jobs lost, jobs gained: Workforce transitions in a time of automation. Retrieved fromhttps://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/public%20and%20social%20sector/our%20insights/what%20the%20future%20of%20work%20will%20mean%20for%20jobs%20skills%20and%20wages/mgi-jobs-lost-jobs-gained-executive-summary-december-6-2017.pdf