Dana was prosecuted for armed robbery of a local convenience store. At trial, the store clerk, Morris, was unable to identify Dana. The robber had been extremely unkempt, with long hair and a scruffy beard. At trial, Dana wore a suit and tie. He was clean shaven and had short hair. The prosecutor then showed Morris a group of photographs. Morris testified that she had previously told the prosecutor that the third photograph was a picture of the robber. The third photograph was a picture of Dana with long hair and a beard. Morris' testimony is:

A) Inadmissible, because it violates Dana's confrontation rights.

B) Inadmissible, as hearsay not within any exception.

C) Admissible, as a prior identification

D) Admissible, as past recollection recorded.