Deborah was visiting her friend Tracy at Tracys apartment complex. The apartment complex had an electronic intercom system and also allowed tenants to unlock the front door remotely from an apartment. Tracy told Deborah she would unlock the front door for her, using the electronic system. The system failed, however, at which point Tracy decided to come down and manually open the door. While Tracy was making her way to the door, Deborah was assaulted by Kenneth and sustained injuries.Deborah is suing the property manager for negligence in failing to maintain a functioning buzzer system. In a jurisdiction following the reasoning and rule adopted by the court in Palsgraf, Deborahs suit will likely:Question $2$ options:A$)$ Prevail because the assault was in the foreseeable zone of danger of a non$-$function door buzzer.B$)$ Prevail under res ipsa loquitur because the property manager held exclusive control over the instrumentality of the injury.C$)$ Not prevail because the electronic intercom system was functioning and Deborah could have called for help.D$)$ Not prevail because the assault was outside the foreseeable zone of danger of a non$-$functioning door buzze