Describe a situation where a stop$-limit$ order would $be$ more advantageous than a stop order when covering a short position.

Multiple Choice

$ifan$ investor $is$ shorting a stock currently trading $at$ $$40,$ they might set a stop$-limit$ order with a stop price $at$ $$55$ and a $limit$ price $at$ $$57.$

$ifan$ investor $is$ shorting a stock currently trading $at$ $$50,$ they might set a stop$-limit$ order with a stop price $at$ $$55$ and a $limit$ price $at$ $$57.$

$ifan$ investor $is$ shorting a stock currently trading $at$ $$57,$ they might set a stop$-limit$ order with a stop price $at$ $$55$ and a $limit$ price $at$ $$57.$

$ifan$ investor $is$ shorting a stock currently trading $at$ $$50,$ they might set a stop$-limit$ order with a stop price $at$ $$57$ and a $limit$ price $at$ $$55.$