Description: First present your conclusion; then, you will present your abstract. The following components are requirements of the assignment:

Conclusion:

• Revisit the controversy.
• Emphasize the seriousness of the controversy.
• Answer the "So what?" question.
• Suggest a general solution (optional).
• Call for awareness/action.
• Leave the reader with a final thought.
• Abstract
  • Restatement of the controversy (one to two sentences)
  • Your thesis (one sentence)
  • Reasons (three to four sentences)
  • Conclusion sentence (one sentence)
• Add the conclusion and abstract to the rest of your paper so that you are turning in a complete research paper. The paper should include all of the following components (in order):
  • Page title
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Literature review
  • Body paragraphs
  • Conclusion
  • References page

This is an example of how unit Vi and VII should be looking on the link below https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-8055649-dt-content-rid-144659530_1/xid-144659530_1

And this last section is my teacher's feedback

{You changed your topic again? Each week in this course, we are building on the information we collected the week before. For example, the sources you found in Unit II should be the primary sources you use in your Unit III proposal and Unit IV Literature Review.

In Unit VI, we are building on the Literature Review that we wrote and revised by adding body paragraphs to support the side of the argument we agree with.

The Collaborate Session recordings, posted on our course announcements page, walk through this process. You will also find information in the study guides and in my unit announcement for each course.}