Discuss the different approaches by the court in relation to First Amendment Jurisprudence. How would you choose between the First Amendment jurisprudence of "Tornillo" and that of "Red Lion." Which makes more sense? Does" Tornillo" overstate the dangers of government regulation and the extent to which editors will be chilled by it? Why did the "Tornillo" court fail to conclude that "it is the right of the [readers], not the right of the [publishers], which is paramount"?