Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
EBIT 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
EBIT | ||||||||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||
CAPEX | 12.000.000 | |||||||||||
Operating costs | ||||||||||||
Maintanance cost | 10.000 | 10.250 | 10.506 | 10.769 | 11.038 | 11.314 | 11.597 | 11.887 | 12.184 | 12.489 | ||
Project benefits | ||||||||||||
Electricity production | 825.389 | 883.166 | 944.988 | 1.011.137 | 1.081.917 | 1.157.651 | 1.238.686 | 1.325.395 | 1.418.172 | 1.517.444 | ||
Accounting profit | ||||||||||||
Revenue | 825.389 | 883.166 | 944.988 | 1.011.137 | 1.081.917 | 1.157.651 | 1.238.686 | 1.325.395 | 1.418.172 | 1.517.444 | ||
Depreciation | 1.200.000 | 1.200.000 | 1.200.000 | 1.200.000 | 1.200.000 | 1.200.000 | 1.200.000 | 1.200.000 | 1.200.000 | 1.200.000 | ||
Operating costs | 10.000 | 10.250 | 10.506 | 10.769 | 11.038 | 11.314 | 11.597 | 11.887 | 12.184 | 12.489 | ||
A | EBIT | (384.611) | (327.084) | (265.518) | (199.632) | (129.121) | (53.663) | 27.090 | 113.508 | 205.988 | 304.956 | |
B | EBITDA | 815.389 | 872.916 | 934.482 | 1.000.368 | 1.070.879 | 1.146.337 | 1.227.090 | 1.313.508 | 1.405.988 | 1.504.956 | |
Tax depreciation | 2.400.000 | 2.400.000 | 2.400.000 | 2.400.000 | 2.400.000 | |||||||
Taxable earnings | (1.584.611) | (1.527.084) | (1.465.518) | (1.399.632) | (1.329.121) | 1.146.337 | 1.227.090 | 1.313.508 | 1.405.988 | 1.504.956 | ||
Taxes | (475.383) | (458.125) | (439.655) | (419.890) | (398.736) | 343.901 | 368.127 | 394.052 | 421.796 | 451.487 | ||
C | Cashflows | (12.000.000) | 1.290.772 | 1.331.041 | 1.374.137 | 1.420.258 | 1.469.615 | 802.436 | 858.963 | 919.455 | 984.192 | 1.053.469 |
PV | (12.000.000) | 1.195.160 | 1.141.153 | 1.090.834 | 1.043.932 | 1.000.195 | 505.671 | 501.196 | 496.753 | 492.341 | 487.960 | |
D | NPV | (4.044.804) | ||||||||||
Scenario figures± | ||||||||||||
Warehouse | OUTSOURCED: Supply and installation | Insourced: installation costs | ||||||||||
North | € 5.000.000 | € 225.000 | ||||||||||
South | € 7.000.000 | € 175.000 | ||||||||||
North & South | € 12.000.000 | € 400.000 | ||||||||||
Project | Usage kWh | Purchase cost | Yearly cost | |||||||||
North | 12.000.000 | € 0,17 | 2.040.000 | |||||||||
South | 10.000.000 | € 0,16 | 1.600.000 | |||||||||
Project | Solar system size: | Total capacity | Sun exposure: Average | Daily production kWh | Yearly production kWh | Savings Y1 | ||||||
North | 6.000 | 1.020 | 8,9 | 9.078 | 3.313.470 | 563.290 | ||||||
South | 4.000 | 680 | 6,6 | 4.488 | 1.638.120 | 262.099 | ||||||
Total | 10.000 | 1.700 | 13.566 | 4.951.590 | 825.389 | |||||||
Solar-generated electricity kWh | North | South | Example | |||||||||
CO2 emissions factor | 100.000 | |||||||||||
CO2 emissions (kg CO2) saved | 0,87 | 1,17 | 0,87 | |||||||||
CO2 emissions (tonnes CO2) saved | 87.000 | |||||||||||
87 | ||||||||||||
Outsourced numerical assumptions: | ||||||||||||
Purchase price solar panel | $ 750,00 | per panel | Only at INSOURCED | |||||||||
Usefull life solar panel accounting | 10 | the | ||||||||||
Usefull life solar panel taks | 5 | the | ||||||||||
Use solar panels | 365 | days p/y | ||||||||||
Depreciation accounting | $ 75,00 | |||||||||||
Depreciation taks | $ 150,00 | by hand | ||||||||||
Maintenance solar panel | $ 1,00 | |||||||||||
Please note: maintenance costs must increase annually with inflation | ||||||||||||
Annual inflation | 2,5% | p/y | ||||||||||
Electricity inflation | 7% | |||||||||||
Let op: 7% including purchase cost credits | ||||||||||||
Hurdle (discount) rate | 8% | |||||||||||
Tax rate | 30% | |||||||||||
Textual assumptions outsourced: | ||||||||||||
CAPEX takes place in Y0, operation of solar panels and depreciation from Y1 | ||||||||||||
After 10 years, the solar panels will be removed free of charge | ||||||||||||
Cash Flow at the beginning of the year | ||||||||||||
There is no deferred tax asset; taxable loss = positive tax effect on CF in the relevant year | ||||||||||||
Own assumptions± | ||||||||||||
Incremental increase in revenue | ||||||||||||
WACC? -> can also be hurdle rate of 8% |
2. For the outsourced alternative for Warehouse North, calculate: a. EBIT b. EBITDA c. Relevant cash flows for the discounted cash flow model d. NPV of the relevant cash flows
Give the answer including the calculation for question of this case? Is tried to answer this with the scenario figures and assumptions.
Step by Step Solution
★★★★★
3.50 Rating (160 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started