eBook Product-Costing Accuracy, Corporate Strategy, ABC Autotech Manufacturing is engaged in the production of replacement parts for automobiles. One plant specializes in the production of two parts: Part 127 and Part #234. Part #127 produced the highest volume of activity, and for many years it was the only part produced by the plant. Five years ago, Part # 234 was added. Part #234 was more difficult to manufacture and required special tooling and setups. Profits increased for the first three years after the addition of the new product. In the last two years, however, the plant faced intense competition, and its sales of Part #127 dropped. In fact, the plant showed a small loss in the most recent reporting period. Much of the competition was from foreign sources, and the plant manager was convinced that the foreign producers were guilty of selling the part below the cost of producing it. The following conversation between Patty Goodson, plant manager and Joseph Fielding, divisional marketing manager, reflects the concerns of the division about the future of the plant and its products JOSEPH: You know, Patty, the divisional manager is real concerned about the plant's trend. He indicated that in this budgetary environment, we can't afford to carry plants that don't show a profit. We shut one down just last month because it couldn't handle the competition PATTY: Joe, you and I both know that Part # 127 has a reputation for quality and value. It has been a mainstay for years. I don't understand what's happening JOSEPH: I just received a call from one of our major customers concerning Part #127. He said that a sales representative from another firm offered the part at $20 per unit-$11 less than what we charge. It's hard to compete with a price like that. Perhaps the plant is simply obsolete. PATTY: No. 1 don't buy that. From my sources, I know we have good technology. We are efficient. And it's costing a attle more than $21 to produce that part. I don't see how these companies can afford to sell it so cheaply. I'm not convinced that we should meet the price. Perhaps a better strategy is to emphasize producing and selling more of Part 234. Our margin is high on this product, and we have virtually no competition for it JOSEPH: You may be nightI think we can increase the orice significantly and not lose business. I called a few Check My Work Previous Next > All work saved Save and Exit Submit Assignment for Grading MacBook Air 20 OOD DOO >11 F3 F4 TS F6 F2 FE FO PATTY: NO. I don't buy that. From my sources, I know we have good technology. We are efficient. And it's costing a little more than $21 to produce that part. I don't see how these companies can afford to sell it so cheaply. I'm not convinced that we should meet the price. Perhaps a better strategy is to emphasize producing and selling more of Part #234. Our margin is high on this product, and we have virtually no competition for it. JOSEPH: You may be right. I think we can increase the price significantly and not lese business. I called a few customers to see how they would react to a 25 percent increase in price, and they all said that they would still purchase the same quantity as before. PATTY: It sounds promising. However, before we make a major commitment to Part 234, I think we had better explore other possible explanations. I want to know how our production costs compare to those of our competitors. Perhaps we could be more efficient and find a way to ear our normal return on Part 127. The market is so much bloger for this part. I'm not sure we can survive with only Part 234. Besides, my production people hate that part. It's very difficult to produce After her meeting with Joseph, Patty requested an investigation of the tive effic ncy. She received approval to hire a consulting group to make an independent Investigation. After a three-month assessment, the consulting group provided the following information on the plant's production activities and costs associated with the two products: costs and com Part #127 Part 0234 Production 500,000 100.000 Selling price $31.86 $24.00 Overhead per unit $12.83 $5.72 Prime cost per unit $8.53 $6.26 Number of production runs 100 200 Receiving orders 400 1,000 Check My Work & 7 * o 9 0 eBook Part #127 10.50 per unit Part #234 11.97 per unit 2. After learning of activity-based costing, Patty asked the controller to compute the product cost using this approach Recompute the unit cost of each product using activity-based costing. Round your interim calculations and answers to the nearest cent. Part #127 17.25 X per unit Part # 234 42.54 per unit Compute the per-unit gross margin for each product. Round your answers to the nearest cent. If an answer is a loss, use a minus (-) sign to indicate. Part # 127 16.61 X per unit Part 234 -18.54 per unit 3. Should the company switch its emphasis from the high-volume product to the low-volume product? NO Foto Che My Work 1. Total expected OH Total direct labor hours-rate per direct labor hour. Assign OH. Calculation for gross margin = Selling price - Cost. Remember to include prime costs in Total cost. 2. Activity based costing systems first traces costs to activities and then to products and other cost objects 3. Review the information given and give a conclusion. Pay special attention to the information for Part #127 Panen Check My Work All work saved. Save and Ex Submit Assignment for Grading MacBook Air 000 20 F3 000 F4 II FS F7 F8 F9