elaborate on the following :Based on the information provided, it seems likely that the company, X$-$treme Madness, would prevail in the discrimination claim made by Ms$.$ Thorel. This is because companies have the right to maintain a respectful and non$-$hostile work environment for all employees. If Ms$.$ Thorel's loud expression of her religious views against homosexuality was creating discomfort or a hostile environment for her coworkers, the company has the right to ask her to refrain from such behavior at work.

The company's actions, as described, do not appear to be discriminatory. They did not fire or demote Ms$.$ Thorel, but simply moved her desk and asked her to stop discussing her religious beliefs at work, presumably because it was causing conflict.

In terms of who should prevail, it's important to balance the rights of individuals to hold and express their personal beliefs with the rights of others to work in a respectful and non$-$hostile environment. In this case, it seems that the company took reasonable steps to address a situation that was causing discomfort for at least one other employee. Therefore, it could be argued that the company should prevail in this case.