Ellen contracts with Games Aplenty to purchase $500$ sets of bingo cards at fifteen dollars each, to be delivered within two weeks. Games Aplenty then learns that the price of its cardstock has doubled. Games Aplenty notifies Ellen that the price of the bingo card sets will be twenty dollars instead of fifteen dollars, and Ellen agrees. When the bingo card sets are delivered to Ellen, she pays only fifteen dollars each. If Games Aplenty sues Ellen for the additional five dollars per card set under the UCC, the court will likely:

not require Ellen to pay because no additional consideration was given by Goods Aplenty for the modification to the contract.

require Ellen to pay even though the modification to the contract was extorted from her.

not require Ellen to pay because Goods Aplenty did not act in good faith.

require Ellen to pay even though no additional consideration was given by Games Aplenty for the modification to the contract.