Exercise 7-43 Activity-Based Supplier Costing Bowman Company manufactures cooling systems. Bowman produces all the parts necessary for its product except for one electronic component, which is purchased from two local suppliers: Manzer Inc. and Buckner Company. Both suppliers are reliable and seldom deliver late; how- ever, Manzer sells the component for $89 per unit, while Buckner sells the same component for $86. Bowman purchases 80% of its components from Buckner because of its lower price. The total annual demand is 4,000,000 components. To help assess the cost effect of the two components, the following data were collected for supplier-related activities and suppliers: I. Activity Data Activity Cost Inspecting components (sampling only) $ 480,000 Reworking products (due to failed component) 6,084,000 Warranty work (due to failed component) 9,600,000 II. Supplier Data Manzer Inc. Buckner Company Unit purchase price $89 $86 Units purchased 800,000 3,200,000 Sampling hours* Rework hours 360 5,640 Warranty hours 800 15,200 * Sampling inspection for Manzer's product has been reduced because the reject rate is so low. (Contin 80 3,920 O Required: zko novinamota boen-viviSA SA 1. Calculate the cost per component for each supplier, taking into consideration the cost of the supplier-related activities and using the current prices and sales volume. (Note: Rotor the unit cost to two decimal places.) 2. Suppose that Bowman loses $4,000,000 in sales per year because it develops a poor reputa tion due to defective units attributable to failed components. Using warranty hours, assign the cost of lost sales to each supplier. By how much would this change the cost of each sup plier's component? (Round to two decimal places.) 3. CONCEPTUAL CONNECTION Based on the analysis in Requirements 1 and 2 discuss the importance of activity-based supplier costing for internal decision making