Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Facts: Rokotavo and Kuro are neighbours in Suva, Fiji. Rokotavo is well educated and has a regular job and family. Kuro is not married. He

Facts: Rokotavo and Kuro are neighbours in Suva, Fiji. Rokotavo is well educated and has a regular job and family. Kuro is not married. He is illiterate, works irregularly, and suffers from severe depression. He also drinks alcohol to excess. Over the five years that Rokotavo and Kuro have been neighbours, Kuro has frequently relied on Rokotavo's advice about personal financial matters. Kuro wanted to sell some land that he had inherited from his father. Rokotavo offered to buy the land from Kuro for $200,000. Kuro agreed to sell to Rokotavo for that price. Rokotavo's solicitor drafted a contract of sale which specified a price of $200,000. The contract contained a clause that allowed either party to terminate the contract if Rokotavo failed to get a bank loan for the purchase price within 21 days of the contract date. Rokotavo took the contract document to Kuro and Kuro signed it without seeking advice from anyone else. Two weeks later, Kuro's brother, Panapasa, telephoned Rokotavo. He told Rokotavo that he was concerned about the very low price for which Kuro had agreed to sell the land. Panapasa said that comparable blocks of land in Suva had recently sold for almost twice the price and that Kuro wanted to terminate the contract. Rokotavo told Panapasa that Kuro could not terminate the contract because he (i.e. Rokotavo) had already obtained a bank loan for the purchase price. Question 1 Can Kuro avoid the contract on the ground of undue influence? Question 2 Would Kuro still be able to avoid the contract if Kuro had not previously relied upon Rokotavo for financial advice? Assume that Rokotavo knew that Kuro was illiterate and had been drinking alcohol on the morning that the contract was signed. Assume also that Rokotavo and Kuro had, just before Kuro signed, had a discussion about the termination clause, in which Kuro had said, in the presence of Rokotavo and Rokotavo's wife, 'I can terminate the contract within 21 days if I want to' and that Rokotavo did not correct Kuro's incorrect understanding of the clause.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Tort Law Responsibilities And Redress

Authors: John C. P. Goldberg, Leslie Kendrick, Anthony J. Sebok, Benjamin C. Zipursky

5th Edition

1543806805, 978-1543806809

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

What does this look like?

Answered: 1 week ago