Question
Federal & State Unemployment Taxes Learning Objective 3 : Compute the federal unemployment tax, the credit against the tax, and any credit reductions that might
Federal & State Unemployment Taxes
|
The employer pays to the state and federal governments an amount for each employee to partially cover the cost of any future layoff or firing. These payments are controlled by the provisions of the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (commonly called FUTA) and the State Unemployment Tax Act (commonly called SUTA).
To encourage states to create their own fair and effective unemployment compensation programs, FUTA levies a per-employee tax on the employer, but this tax is reduced by all or a portion of any tax paid to the individual state where the employee is employed.
Review this process, look at the FUTA-SUTA.PPTX then come back to answer the questions below.
To review, Step 1 is to calculate the total taxable FUTA wages. Normally, this tax is applied to the first $ of each employees wages.
Once you have totaled FUTA-taxable wages, apply the current FUTA rate of % to compute gross FUTA tax for the year.
Next you determine SUTA-taxable wages (usually the same as FUTA-taxable wages) and apply a credit of up to %. Subtract that credit from the gross FUTA tax and you have computed the net FUTA tax due. |
Learning Objective 4: | Describe how an experience-rating system is used in determining employers' contributions to state unemployment compensation funds. |
The reality of the business world is that some companies have stable workforces and some have a history of employment ups and downs. Workers are hired and laid off with rises and falls in the business cycle or the company's level of success. In theory, employers with stable workforce histories are not as big a drain on state and federal unemployment funds as are companies with a more up-and-down record.
The experience rating approach uses a company's historic track record of hiring and termination as an estimate for the future risk to the state's unemployment fund. Under the each state's unemployment laws (often called SUTA), the individual states implement this concept in slightly different ways.
In addition to varying the tax rate for each individual company based on their employment history, many states also vary the annual rate charged based on the condition of the entire state unemployment fund. In other words, they look at total experience rating for all companies to make sure there is enough in the fund to cover expected unemployment benefits.
In this first step, you will review the experience rating and reserve ratio concepts. In the subsequent steps, you will apply these to two actual state tables to apply the concept.
The determination of experience rating first involves the calculation of the "reserve ratio", which is usually defined as shown below. Roll your mouse over the underlined terms to see a more complete definition:
Reserve ratio | = | Contributions - Benefits paid |
Average payroll |
Look carefully at the top two terms in the equation above. In most states each employer has an individual "reserve account" into which taxes are paid and benefits are withdrawn over time, like a savings account. So another way to express the reserve ratio is compare the size of that reserve account with the size of the payroll. How would you express the calculation above in terms of the company's reserve account balance?
Elsinore Construction Company has paid $11200.00 in unemployment taxes to its state to date, while being charged $215000 in benefits paid out over that same period. Elsinore's average payroll is 9050000, and state taxable wages for this period are 7440000.
Below is the state unemployment tax table for this year for each range of reserve ratios:
Reserve Ratio | Rate | Reserve Ratio | Rate | Reserve Ratio | Rate |
17% and over | 0.50% | 7.00% to 7.99% | 2.20% | -6.00% to -8.99% | 5.20% |
16.00% to 15.99% | 0.60% | 6.00% to 6.99% | 2.50% | -9.00% to -11.99% | 5.30% |
15.00% to 14.99% | 0.70% | 5.00% to 5.99% | 2.80% | -12.00% to -14.99% | 5.40% |
13.00% to 13.99% | 0.80% | 4.00% to 4.99% | 3.10% | -15.00% to -19.99% | 5.50% |
12.00% to 12.99% | 0.90% | 3.00% to 3.99% | 3.20% | -20.00% to -29.99% | 5.60% |
11.00% to 11.99% | 1.00% | 2.00% to 2.99% | 3.30% | -30.00% to -34.99% | 5.70% |
10.00% to 10.99% | 1.30% | 1.00% to 1.99% | 3.40% | -35.00% and under | 5.80% |
9.00% to 9.99% | 1.60% | 0.00% to 0.99% | 3.60% | ||
8.00% to 8.99% | 1.90% | -0.00% to -5.99% | 5.10% |
1.a. What is Elsinore's reserve account balance? $
1.b. What is Elsinore's reserve ratio ? Round your answer to the nearest percent. %
1.c. What is Elsinore's SUTA tax rate? Round your answer to one decimal place. %
1.d. How much does Elsinore owe in SUTA taxes this year? Round your answer to the nearest dollar. $
Most states assign unemployment tax rates strictly on the individual experience of the company. This is called "fixed ranking," and is the method you used in the prior step. In this step you will look at an actual states fixed ranking tax tables.
Eleven states assign SUTA rates according to how each employers experience rating ranks when compared to the experience of other employers in the state. This is called "array ranking." You will see an actual array ranking state's tax tables in the step following this one.
One more real-world complication is that many states have added factors to their tax tables which take into consideration the overall health of the state's unemployment fund. If the fund is running low and demand for benefits is high, the state has a formula for temporarily raising the SUTA rates to make up the shortfall.
In this step you will look at how the state of California has handled this issue in recent years, and you will get a chance to apply your understanding of experience rating to this case. California performs an annual grading of the state unemployment fund balance, compared with the total payroll in the state, and assigns a letter grade for the year, as shown by this table:
Balance of the UI Fund on September 30 | Percentage | |
Gross wages reported by all employers | = | to determine |
during the fiscal year ending on the | the rate | |
computation date (June 30) | schedule | |
This calculation establishes the rate schedule as follows: | ||
PERCENTAGE | CONTRIBUTION RATE SCHEDULES | |
Greater than: | Equal to or less than: | |
1.8 | AA | |
1.6 | 1.8 | A |
1.4 | 1.6 | B |
1.2 | 1.4 | C |
1.0 | 1.2 | D |
0.8 (or equal to) | 1.0 | E |
0.6 (or equal to) | 0.799 | F |
If you need to calculate SUTA taxes in California, you first need to find out the letter grade for the state for the current year. For this exercise, assume that the unemployment insurance (UI) fund balance, divided by gross reported wages, yields a factor of 1.35%. This means that your calculation of taxes due for this year needs to refer to Contribution Rate Schedule
See the file CA UI Tax Rate Schedule.xlsx to see a recent actual California SUTA tax schedule. Note how both the experience rating concept and the annual UI fund grading are implemented as rows and columns in the table.
2.a. Arcata Facility Services, Inc., has a reserve ratio of -0.07. The taxable payroll for the year is $235400. Using the table in the link above, and the correct schedule also determined above, Arcata's SUTA tax rate for this year is: %
2.b. Calculate Arcata's SUTA tax liability to the nearest cent: $
As noted in the prior step, some states assign SUTA rates according to how each employer's experience rating ranks when compared to the experience of other employers in the state. This is called "array ranking."
Iowa is an example of an array ranking state. Let's see if you can apply your knowledge of experience ranking to figure out how to adapt to Iowa's SUTA system.
In Iowa's case, the reserve ratio formula is changed slightly to eliminate the employer contributions, which they call the "benefit ratio."
Benefit ratio | = | 5-year average benefits paid |
5-year average payroll |
The goal of the company is to get a benefit ratio score as LOW as possible. Note that a company can achieve a lower score in two different ways. First, it can work to get its amount of benefit claims through fewer layoffs and firings. Or alternatively, the company can work to get its average payroll, through adding new workers. Both of these actions benefit the states total workforce and economy.
The state then accumulates the benefit ratios of all employers in the state (a special rate applies for companies with less than five years of history), and groups them from low-to-high into 21 ranks. This is the "array ranking," as shown in the rows of the SUTA tax table below.
Benefit Ratio Rank | Approximate Cumulative Taxable Payroll Limit | Contribution Rates Table | |||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ||
1 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
2 | 9.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
3 | 14.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
4 | 19.0 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
5 | 23.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
6 | 28.6 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
7 | 33.3 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
8 | 38.1 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
9 | 42.8 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
10 | 47.6 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
11 | 52.4 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
12 | 57.1 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.4 |
13 | 61.9 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.5 |
14 | 66.6 | 4.4 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 |
15 | 71.4 | 5.3 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.7 |
16 | 76.2 | 6.3 | 5.2 | 4.1 | 3.2 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
17 | 80.9 | 7.0 | 6.4 | 5.2 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 1.1 |
18 | 85.7 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 5.4 | 4.1 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 1.5 |
19 | 90.4 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 7.3 | 5.6 | 4.2 | 3.1 | 2.0 |
20 | 95.2 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 7.6 | 5.8 | 4.3 | 2.8 |
21 | 100.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 |
Like the California example of the prior step in this exercise, Iowa also has varying rate columns, using numbered grades rather than letter grades, to adjust the rates depending on the health of the UI fund. A higher column number means a poorer "grade." Examine the table to see if you can determine the financial incentive that a company has, especially in years when the fund is not healthy, to move lower in the benefit ratio ranking.
3.a. Creston Biofuels, Inc., has a benefit ratio rank of 11. For this tax year, Contribution Rate Table column 3 is to be used. The taxable payroll for the year is $325300. Using the table above, Crestons SUTA tax rate for this year is: %
3.b. Calculate Creston Biofuel's SUTA tax liability to the nearest cent: $
Note: For this problem, the rate 0.6% was used for the FUTA tax rate for employers.
4. As the accountant for Runson Moving Company, you are preparing the company's annual return, Form 940 and Schedule A. Use the following information to complete Form 940 and Schedule A.
The net FUTA tax liability for each quarter of 2017 was as follows: 1st, $215.20; 2nd, $107.90; 3rd, $97.20; and 4th, $51.96 plus the credit reduction.
Since the net FUTA tax liability did not exceed $500 until the 4th quarter, the company was required to make its first deposit of FUTA taxes on January 31, 2018. Assume that the electronic payment was made on time.
a. One of the employees performs all of his duties in another state-Arizona.
b. Total payments made to employees during calendar year 2017:
California | $100,000 |
Arizona | 18,660 |
Total | $118,660 |
c. Employer contributions in California into employees' 401(k) retirement plan: $3,450.
d. Payments made to employees in excess of $7,000: $36,500 ($11,660 from Arizona and $24,840 from California).
e. Form is to be signed by Mickey Vixon, Vice President.
f. Phone number - (219) 555-8310.
If an input box does not require an entry, leave it blank. When required, round amounts to the nearest cent.
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started