/ Figure C9.1.1 Page 1 of 5 Part 1 / Figure C9.1.1 Continued Page 2 of 5 Figure C9.1.2 Page 3 of 5 Figure C9.1.3 Continued Page 4 of 5 Figure C9.1.3 Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Total n UCL = UCL = No.of Non conformities Can ( Di) 12 15 8 10 4 7 16 9 14 10 5 6 17 12 22 8 10 5 13 12 20 18 24 15 9 12 7 13 9 6 348 = np+ 3((1)) np3((1)) ( Sample Fraction Nonconforming 0.24 0.3 0.16 25 0.2 0.08 20 0.14 0.32 0.18 15 0.28 0.2 100.1 0.12 0.34 5 0.24 0.44 0.16 0 0.2 1 0.1 0.26 0.24 0.4 0.36 0.48 0.3 0.18 0.24 0.14 0.26 0.18 0.12 0.2320 NP Chart of C1 1 1 UCL=20.55 Sample Count Sample No. 50 = 20.55 = 2.65 __ NP=11.6 LCL=2.65 4 7 10 13 16 Sample 19 22 25 28 2 5 2 0 0 2 6 15 3 2 0 0 0 2 4 8 4 4 1 1 1 1 2 10 Defect STRIP BRK CRIMP WRAP BASE LABEL FILL 5 2 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 2 1 0 0 0 4 7 Frequency 125 27 18 15 24 139 348 7 4 2 2 0 2 6 16 8 4 0 0 0 0 5 9 9 5 1 1 1 2 4 14 10 2 2 0 1 1 4 10 11 2 0 0 0 1 2 5 12 3 0 0 0 0 3 6 13 8 2 1 0 0 6 17 14 4 2 0 1 2 3 12 15 8 0 0 1 2 11 22 16 3 1 0 0 0 4 8 17 2 2 0 0 0 6 10 18 1 1 0 0 0 3 5 19 4 1 1 1 1 5 13 20 4 1 2 0 0 5 12 21 7 1 2 1 1 8 20 22 7 1 2 1 1 6 18 Pareto Chart of Defect 400 100 300 80 60 200 139 125 40 100 20 27 0 Defect Frequency Percent Cum % FIL L 139 39.9 39.9 STRIP BRK 125 35.9 75.9 24 18 15 CRIMP 27 7.8 83.6 LABEL 24 6.9 90.5 WRAP 18 5.2 95.7 BASE 15 4.3 100.0 Sof defect FILL should be solved first since it is contributing 40% of the defect and then STRP BRK and both are contrubuting approximately 76% of the total Defect 0 Percent 1 4 0 2 0 2 4 12 Frequency STRIP BRK CRIMP WRAP BASE LABEL FILL 23 10 2 0 2 3 7 24 24 6 1 2 2 0 4 15 25 4 0 0 0 0 5 9 26 4 1 1 1 1 4 12 27 3 1 0 0 0 3 7 28 4 1 1 2 0 5 13 29 4 0 0 0 0 5 9 30 3 0 0 0 0 3 6 Total 125 27 18 15 24 139 348 STRIP BRK CRIMP WRAP BASE LABEL FILL 1 4 0 1 0 0 1 6 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 4 3 3 1 0 0 1 1 6 4 2 0 1 1 1 0 5 5 2 1 1 1 2 0 7 6 4 1 0 0 1 0 6 7 1 0 1 1 1 1 5 8 1 1 0 0 1 0 3 9 5 1 0 0 1 0 7 10 0 1 1 1 2 1 6 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 12 3 0 0 0 1 0 4 13 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 14 3 1 1 0 1 0 6 15 4 0 0 0 1 0 5 16 2 0 0 1 1 0 4 NP Chart of C2 17 4 0 0 0 1 0 5 18 2 0 1 1 1 1 6 19 4 0 0 1 1 1 7 20 1 1 1 0 1 1 5 Total 50 8 9 7 19 9 102 Pareto Chart - Part2 12 100 100 80 UCL=11.52 80 6 __ NP=5.1 60 60 50 40 40 4 19 20 2 0 LCL=0 1 3 5 7 9 11 Sample 13 15 17 19 0 C1 C2 P ercent Cum % 20 9 STRIP BRK 50 49.0 49.0 LABEL 19 18.6 67.6 9 8 7 FILL 9 8.8 76.5 WRAP 9 8.8 85.3 CRIMP 8 7.8 93.1 BASE 7 6.9 100.0 So defect STRIP BRK should be solved first since it is contributing 49% of the defect and then LABEL and both are contrubuting approximately 68% of the total Defect 0 Percent 8 C2 Sample Count 10 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 STRIP BRK CRIMP WRAP BASE LABEL FILL 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 10 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 15 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 1 0 0 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 NP Chart - Part 3 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 3 4 2 5 4 0 18 Pareto Chart of Part 3 4 20 UCL=3.720 100 15 2 0 LCL=0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Sample 60 10 __ NP=0.9 1 80 5 0 C1 C2 Percent Cum % Now the process is quite in the Stastical limit and under control and BASE is major problem reflected by Pareto Chart. 5 40 4 4 3 20 2 0 BASE 5 27.8 27.8 CRIMP 4 22.2 50.0 LABEL 4 22.2 72.2 STRIP BRK 3 16.7 88.9 WRAP 2 11.1 100.0 Other 0 0.0 100.0 0 Percent C2 Sample Count 3 1 6 2 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 6 4 6 5 7 6 5 3 7 6 2 4 3 6 5 4 5 6 7 5 3 6 4 5 5 7 6 6 7 5 8 3 9 7 10 6 11 2 12 4 13 3 14 6 15 5 16 4 17 5 18 6 19 7 20 5