Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
For purposes of this case study, we assume that the disputed telephone call was made by the fabrication firm, and that the engineering firm did
For purposes of this case study, we assume that the disputed telephone call was made by the fabrication firm, and that the engineering firm did give verbal approval for the fatal design change. Students are, however, encouraged to view the case reversing these assumptions.
Guidelines For Presentation
Read student handout for a detailed description of the case.
At the class preceding case discussion, distribute student handouts: The Kansas City Hyatt Regency Walkways Collapse, which includes literature on negligence and the professional "debate" over responsibility for design, and an annotated bibliography. Have students come to the followup discussion class prepared to address the Kansas City Hyatt Regency Walkways Collapse in light of the ethical issues raised in the student handout.
Show Hyatt Regency Walkways Collapse segment of the To Engineer is Human," video. Discuss with students the five overheads:
The Hyatt Regency Walkways Collapse Cast of Characters
Hanger Rod Details Original Design and As Built
Chronology of the Hyatt Regency Walkways Collapse four pages
ASME Code of Ethics of Engineers; and
IEEE Code of Ethics. Ask students some of the following questions:
Who is ultimately responsible for the fatal design flaw? Why?
Does the disputed telephone call matter to the outcome of the case? Why or why not?
What is the responsibility of a licensed professional engineer who affixes hisher seal to fabrication drawings?
In terms of meeting building codes, what are the responsibilities of the engineer? The fabricator? The owner?
What measures can professional societies take to ensure that catastrophes such as the Hyatt Regency Walkways Collapse do not occur?
Do you agree with the find ings that the principal engineers involved should have been subject to discipline for gross negligence in the practice of engineering? Should they have lost their licenses, temporarily or permanently?
Was it fair that GCE as a company, was held liable for gross negligence and engineering incompetence? Why or why not?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started