For this assignment, assume you are in clinical practice and are in a duty to warn risk management situation. This application assignment is formatted as a formal report (using an outline format) to document the ethical decision-making process in thePennsylvania Supreme Court Decision, Emerich V. Philadelphia Center for Human Development, Inc.(Watson, 2005) duty to warn case. This is not formatted as a narrative paper, but rather as a bulleted outline, using complete sentences, to clearly demonstrate the ethical decision-making process. In real-world practice, this outline could be used to present and discuss the ethical decision-making process with your supervisor. You are applyingA Practitioner's Guide to Ethical Decision MakingtoPennsylvania Supreme Court Decision, Emerich V. Philadelphia Center for Human Development, Inc.(Watson, 2005). Note: You are NOT applying A Practitioner's Guide to Ethical Decision Making to the historical Tarasoff case.

• Complete a formal report (using the provided template) to demonstrate your ethical decision-making process
• ApplyA Practitioner's Guide to Ethical Decision MakingtoPennsylvania Supreme Court Decision, Emerich V. Philadelphia Center for Human Development, Inc.(Watson, 2005)
• Outline the steps to follow to help determine an appropriate course of action in thePennsylvania Supreme Court Decision, Emerich V. Philadelphia Center for Human Development, Inc.(Watson, 2005)
• Include diversity, inclusion, and cultural considerations. Diversity considerations need to be positioned in context of the counselor (i.e., you and what identities, values, etc. you hold), client (i.e., what identities, values, etc. they hold). For example, this counselor identifies as X and consideration should be given to Y to prevent orpromote Z.
• Cite appropriate federal and state laws and ACA ethical codes, as well as the ethical codes from ASCA, IAMFC, or an ACA division to support your decision