From the book, "Criminal Procedure: Law and Practice. The "in action: a private poker game overheard" scenario from the textbook located on page 271. 1. Law officer Roberts looking through the window valid under the plain view doctrine? 2. Was officer Roberts observation of the cocaine while standing in the open door valid under the plain view doctrine? 3. Was officer Roberts seizure of the cocaine in the living room valid under the plain view doctrine? Explain