Galileo's Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems is one of the most important historical documents and ranks highly among the classics of science. It provided an exposition of the then prevailing views on the structure of the cosmos: advocating and fighting for the Copernican theory. Galileo used the form of dialogue partly influenced by Plato's example to construct a sharp and vivid confrontation of opinions as he wanted to avoid an open commitment in these controversial questions - they would have brought forward the death sentences delivered to him by the Inquisition. The Dialogue was an immense success upon its publication despite the fact that Galileo's enemies succeeded in banning it five months after publication. The Dialogue takes the form of a discussion between Salviati, who argues in favor of Copernicus, the impartial but intelligent layman Sagredo, and the peripatetic Simplicio, a man who represents the traditional world views of Aristotle and Ptolemy. Construct a dialogue between a behavioural finance scholar (Behavioralist) and a classical finance scholar (Rationalist). Add later on in the dialogue a third scholar who promotes the idea of adaptive markets (Evolutionist). Make sure that the dialogue represents the conflicts, insights, methods, and challenges of those different approaches. Don't worry about the aesthetic quality of the dialogue. Focus on the line of argumentation and the power of the dialogue