Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Gar, Mur and Wil were partners, in a firm, sharing profits and losses equally. Their capitals were not equal. There was no partnership deed. The

Gar, Mur and Wil were partners, in a firm, sharing profits and losses equally. Their capitals were not equal. There was no partnership deed. The firm dissolved on 30th June 2020. The position was as follows, after dissolution: Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2020 Liabilities $ Assets $ Gar capital a/c 2500 Mur capital a/c 314 Cash 1916 Wil capital 263 Loss on realisation 635 Wil became insolvent and could not pay anything against the capital deficiency. ACCT3801 21/01 The Council of Community Colleges of Jamaica Page 7 Required C. Prior to the Garner vs Murrays rule, Mur had raised an objection and claimed that the loss is a capital loss and not a business loss. Therefore, such loss due to capital deficiency of a partner to be borne in capital ratio and not in profit sharing ratio. In court, Mur got the decision in his favour. Explain FOUR (4) points in the Garner vs Murray decision?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Management and Cost Accounting

Authors: Alnoor Bhimani, Charles T. Horngren, Srikant M. Datar, George Foster

4th edition

1405888202, 978-0273711490, 273711490, 978-1405888202

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

What are bona fide occupational qualifications?

Answered: 1 week ago