George Burdell is Georgina$$s uncle and works as a $$strategy consultant.$$ Uncle George approaches Georgina with an idea to improve the data labeling and annotation process. He proposes to merge Stages $2$ and $3($data labeling and annotation, and quality assurance$)$ by applying advanced image processing algorithms developed by a startup he invested in$.$ He claims that by using this startup$$s technology, Georgina can merge and $$speed up$$ labeling, annotation, and quality assurance.

Specifically, it currently takes $33\mathrm{.}3$ minutes $($or $60/1\mathrm{.}8$ hours$)$ for Stage $2$ to process a gigabyte of data and $30$ minutes $(60/2$ hours$)$ for Stage $3$ to process a gigabyte of data $(63\mathrm{.}3$ minutes in total for stages $2$ and $3).$ Uncle George said his technology would allow a new merged Stage $2$ and $3$ to process a gigabyte of data in $45$ minutes $($instead of $63\mathrm{.}3$ minutes in the separate stages$).$It$$s much faster!$$ he claims. The new process would have only three stages: the former stage $1,$ the new faster stage $2+3,$ and the former stage $4.$ The data loss of the new stage $2+3$ is expected to be $28\%(72\%$ of the data that enters $2+3$ continues to stage $4).$ This is the same as the aggregate loss of the previous stages $2$ and $3.$

Assume the same setting as Question $1($i$.$e$.,$ ignore the extra employee from Question $2$ and yield improvement from Question $3).$ Should Georgina listen to her uncle? Why or why not?