Question
George Foster, a businessman from Pennsylvania, had a dispute with The Sisk Corporation, a New York corporation, which, Foster is convinced, breached a contract they
George Foster, a businessman from Pennsylvania, had a dispute with The Sisk
Corporation, a New York corporation, which, Foster is convinced, breached a contract they
had entered into to provide services to Foster in Philadelphia. The breach occurred on
September 19, 2012. On March 26, 2018, Foster retained Fernandez & Dykstra, LLP, a New
York law firm, to commence an action against Sisk. Senior partner William Hayward Wilson
took on the representation. The retainer agreement with Fernandez & Dykstra provided that,
in the event of any dispute, New York law would govern, and that any lawsuit arising under
the agreement must be brought within one year of accrual. It also provided a promise by
Fernandez & Dykstra to timely file an action against Sisk.
Wilson did not immediately pay attention to Foster's matter, because he was busy
planning to leave Fernandez & Dykstra, to form another partnership with his friend Lee
Mazzilli. In fact, on May 6, 2019, Wilson left his old firm, opening the new offices of Wilson &
Mazzilli, P.C. Foster agreed to have Wilson take his matter to his new firm, and signed an
identical retainer agreement with the new firm.
But, still, Wilson did not actively pursue Foster's matter. From time to time, Wilson
would bill Foster for "investigative work," which Wilson paid. But, beginning in early 2020,
Foster began attempting to pester Wilson to get on with the litigation, and kept asking about
the status. Wilson did not respond. Finally, when Foster received another bill from Wilson &
Mazzilli on April 14, 2020, Foster had had enough, and he wrote a sharply worded letter:
"Your conduct in this matter is completely despicable and unprofessional. You have
avoided me, yet I have already paid you outrageous sums considering how little you
have done in this matter. You are a complete jerk, and I hate you. I want nothing more
to do with you. You are a terrible lawyer, and I have no faith in you whatsoever. I
never want to speak to you again. If you don't move my case to trial soon I don't know how to expect me to pay the outrageous bills".
how you expect me to pay your outrageous bills."
6
Still, Wilson remained silent.
Finally, completely out of patience, Foster retained a new lawyer, on October 13, 2020.
The new lawyer discovered that Wilson had never commenced an action against Sisk
Corporation, and immediately did so. In May 2021, that action was dismissed on statute of
limitations grounds.
You can imagine Foster's reaction when, on June 14, 2023, Wilson & Mazzilli sued him
for unpaid fees. Let's just say that, on August 3, 2023, Foster answered the complaint, and
counterclaimed against Wilson & Mazzilli for malpractice. Foster also named Wilson
personally, and Fernandez & Dykstra, as third party defendants seeking the same damages
for malpractice.
Foster has moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint; Wilson and
Wilson & Mazzilli have together moved for summary judgment dismissing the
counterclaim, as has, separately, Fernandez & Dykstra. Please draft the argument .
portion of each party's brief in support of their motion, and in opposition to their
adversary's motion
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started