Given that Canadian research estimated a $235 billion cost to the global economy between 1987 and 2060, do you support the Montreal Protocol's economic trade-offs, given its importance in protecting both human and environmental health? If not, should we instead push more protocols to develop eco-friendly jobs and eliminate CFC use even in developing countries? How do you suggest we could help this message reach those countries? Also, Given the decline in CFC production to 2% of its peak by 2004, should efforts to further reduce ozone depletion be intensified, especially given the ozone hole's continued expansion?\