Gloria left her apartment for work without turning off or undlugging the curling iron in her bathroom. While she is gone, there is an unexpected earthquake that causes the hot curling iron to tumble violently onto a piece of paper on the floor and start a fire. The fire burns down the entire apartment building. A neighbor sues Gloria for negligence. If the neighbor loses the case, it is because which element of negligence is likely not satisfied: Injury to plaintiff Actual causation Extreme and outrageous conduct Proximate causation Question 11(2.5 points) Josephine purchases a riding lawnmower made by Lawnmowers, Inc. Josephine is unsatisfied with the wheels on the lawnmower, so she replaces them with wheels that she finds from a different vendor. While using the lawnmower, the new wheels malfunction and cause andccident that injures Josephine. If Josephine sues Lawnmowers, Inc, for a product defect under the doctrine of strict liability, she will likely lose because: The doctrine of strict liability does not apply to product defects. Josephine materially altered the product. Josephine cannot prove breach of duty. Josephine will be judged against a reasonable professional standard