Question
Going back to the Savary case (TC Summary 2010-150) where Savary , a US citizen, was a flight attendant that lived and worked in Paris.
Going back to the Savary case (TC Summary 2010-150) where Savary , a US citizen, was a flight attendant that lived and worked in Paris. The Tax Court reviewing Art 24 (Relief from Double Taxation) in the US-France DTC, concluded that France should give a credit for the US taxes on Savary's wages. Since France had already declined to provide a credit for the US tax, Savary was subject to double taxation by both contracting states on USD 23,321 (the Tax Court allowed Savary to exclude under sec 911 as foreign earned income USD 14,415).
Is this a correct reading of the Art 24? Art 24 has a 3-bite rule similar to the 3-bite rule in the US MC. The first bite is Art 24(2)(a)(iii). The second bite is Art 24(2)(a). The third bite is Art 24(1)(b)(i). The Treasury Department Technical Explanation to the US-France DTC provides a clear roadmap to the 3-bite rule so you may want to read it.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started