Question
Gokongwie v. SEC GR NO. L- 45911 April 11, 1979 Antonio, J.: Facts: John Gokongwei Jr., as stockholder of San Miguel Corporation, filed with the
Gokongwie v. SEC
GR NO. L- 45911 April 11, 1979
Antonio, J.:
Facts:
John Gokongwei Jr., as stockholder of San Miguel
Corporation, filed with the SEC a petition for "declaration of
nullity of amended by-laws, cancellation of certificate of filing of
amended by-laws, injunction and damages with prayer for a
preliminary injunction" against the majority of the members of the
Board of Directors and San Miguel Corporation as an unwilling
petitioner.
Gokongwei alleged that the Board amended the bylaws of
the corporation, prescribing additional qualifications for its
directors, "that no person shall qualify or be eligible for
nomination if he is engaged in any business which competes
with that of the Corporation."
The board based their authority to do so on a resolution of
the stockholders. It was contended that according to section 22
of the Corporation Law and Article VIII of the by-laws of the
corporation, the power to amend, modify, repeal or adopt new
by-laws may be delegated to the Board of Directors only by the
affirmative vote of stockholders representing not less than 2/3 of
the subscribed and paid up capital stock of the corporation,
which 2/3 should have been computed on the basis of the
capitalization at the time of the amendment. Since the
amendment was based on the 1961 authorization, Gokongwei
contended that the Board acted without authority and in
usurpation of the power of the stockholders.
Gokongwei claimed that prior to the questioned
amendment, he had all the qualifications to be a director of the
corporation, being a substantial stockholder thereof; that as a
stockholder, Gokongwei had acquired rights inherent in stock
ownership, such as the rights to vote and to be voted upon in the
election of directors; and that in amending the by-laws, Soriano,
et. al. purposely provided for Gokongwei's disqualification and
deprived him of his vested right as afore-mentioned, hence the
amended by-laws are null and void.
QUESTION : Whether or not the amended by-laws of SMC disqualifying a competitor from nomination or election to the Board of Directors of SMC is valid and reasonable.
please answer with explanation thanks!
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started