Gonzales vs. Carhart, 127 S.Ct. 1610, 550 U.S. 124 (2007)

After your research is completed, submit a typed brief of the case in

• The brief does not have to be longer than two pages in length and should follow this format:
  • Each case is given a title that signals the type of case about to be reviewed.
  • Case citation. Gonzales vs. Carhart, 127 S.Ct. 1610, 550 U.S. 124 (2007)
  • A review of the details of the case. These should be summarized in clear, concise, chronological statements and be numerically ordered. Only the major facts, important to the issues in the case, should be included.
  • The issues discussed in any given case are selected for review on the basis of medical and legal pertinence to the health care professional. Although any one case may have multiple issues, only those considered pertinent are reviewed here. Students should phrase the issue of the case in the form of one or two brief statements (e.g., the issue is whether or not a woman's right to privacy allows her to have an abortion).
  • The court's ruling based on the facts, issues, and applicable laws pertaining to the issue in the case, which should be phrased in the form of a summary statement.
  • The rationale behind how the court arrived at its decision based on the facts, issues, and relevant laws surrounding the case. Students should summarize in numerical steps the reasoning of the court in deciding the case.

After completing the typed case brief, answer discussion questions pertaining to the case.

• Discussion questions, although prompted by a particular case, may not necessarily be germane to the facts of the case. The questions merely allow you to brainstorm how you would respond as a leader when faced with a healthcare administrative dilemma.
• Choose four (4) questions below and discuss them in relation to the issue outlined in the case brief.
  • Are all the elements required in a negligence suit present?
  • What standard of care is required?
  • Who would you consider to be the potential plaintiff and defendant?
  • How would you argue for the plaintiff?
  • What evidence would you present?
  • How would you defend the defendant?
  • What are your defense options?
  • If you were on the jury, what would your finding be, based on only the facts as presented and the classroom discussion?