Harriet intends to bring an action in small claims court against her landlord. She meets with lawyer Joaquin, who is experienced in landlord-tenant law, to see if he will represent her in the matter. After discussing the case, Joaquin and Harriet agree to a flat fee of $1,000 for the representation, a reasonable fee given the time and effort Joaquin will expend on the case. Joaquin knows that Angels, a landlord-tenant lawyer three blocks away, would do the same work for $500. In fact, Joaquin believes that Harriet's case is so strong that she could probably represent herself and win. Joaquin does not inform Harriet of these things, and he accepts the case. Is Joaquin subject to discipline? Group of answer choices A. Yes, because Joaquin was required to tell Harriet that she could resolve her problem without the use of Joaquin's services. B. Yes, because Joaquin was required to tell Harriet that she could achieve the same result while paying a lower fee. C. Yes, because Joaquin must make disclosures to the extent reasonably necessary to permit Harriet to make informed decisions regarding the representation. D. No, because attorneys are not required to tell prospective clients that they could resolve their own problems at a lower cost or no cost