Question
Hearsay exceptions. Prosecution of Defendant for kidnapping. Defendant denies involvement. During their investigation, the police questioned Zed. At first, Zed denied having any knowledge of
Hearsay exceptions.
Prosecution of Defendant for kidnapping. Defendant denies involvement. During their
investigation, the police questioned Zed. At first, Zed denied having any knowledge
of the crime. After being warned that his lack of cooperation might lead to his being
charged as a principal in the crime, Zed admitted involvement, but claimed his only
role was to develop information about the victims daily routine and to pass it along
to Defendant, who Zed claimed actually captured and held the victim. Zed also told
the police how and where Defendant captured the victim. Zed was killed in an auto
accident before trial. The prosecution offers Zeds statements into evidence.
Defendant objects on hearsay grounds. How should the court rule?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started