Hello

I need help doing the following assignment.

The most popular way for international expansion is for a local firm to acquire foreign companies. One of the most benefits for international expansion is global distribution capability that helps expanding the market share.

There are different implications of running a company that is within or outside of the European Union. If you were the head of a firm based in the United States, please answer the following questions, providing the rationale behind your answers:

1. An executive summary must be provided.
2. Would you seek to acquire a company within the European Union or outside of it? Why?
3. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of the choice you made.
4. Describe the advantages and disadvantages inherent in the option you did not choose.
5. Explain why an MNC may invest funds in a financial market outside its own country.
6. Explain why some financial institutions prefer to provide credit in financial markets outside their own country.

Please see the criteria attached.

Graduate Program RubricMASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Expectations: Student work at the graduate level is expected to focus on mastery of advanced discipline-specific frameworks, professional practices, and tools. Criteria BUSINESS PROGRAM CONTENT PROFESSIONAL MASTERY AND KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION/MANAGEMENT Functional areas include, where applicable: Leadership, management, innovation, and teambuilding Operations and Marketing Finance Economics Qualitative and quantitative tools Technology and Internet Ethical and legal issues International issues EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION Approach and Purpose, Organization, Style, Grammar, Mechanics, Format, Presentation and Delivery (where applicable) Exemplary (A)) Accomplished (B) Proficient (C) Partially Proficient (D) Unacceptable (F) Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Demonstrates sound or accomplished mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Demonstrates adequate or proficient mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Most requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Many requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates inadequate or partially proficient mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Demonstrates unacceptable mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Some requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Few or no requirements of the assignment are included in the response. All requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates outstanding expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is addressed appropriately. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Demonstrates sound or accomplished application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates adequate or proficient application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates sound or accomplished expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Demonstrates adequate expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is usually addressed appropriately. Language does not interfere with the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Audience is generally addressed appropriately. Language is adequate, generally communicating ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are minimal. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are present, but do not distract. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are present and sometimes distract from meaning or presentation. Organization is clear. Organization is apparent Organization is adequate, 1 Demonstrates inadequate or partially proficient application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates inadequate or partial expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is often not addressed appropriately. Language often impedes the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are frequent and often distract from Demonstrates unacceptable application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates unacceptable, unclear expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is not addressed appropriately. Language does not clearly and effectively communicate ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are pervasive and consistently distracting. Criteria Exemplary (A)) Format is consistently appropriate to assignment. Presentation and delivery are confident and persuasive (where applicable). CRITICAL ANALYSIS Evaluative, Integrative, Creative Thinking RESEARCH AND INFORMATION LITERACY Sources and Support for Assignment Accomplished (B) and mostly clear. Format is appropriate to assignment, but not entirely consistent. Proficient (C) though confusing or unclear at times. Partially Proficient (D) meaning or presentation. Format is adequate, but inconsistent. Organization is inadequate, confusing, and distracting. Unacceptable (F) Format is absent or consistently appropriate to assignment. Organization is not apparent and completely inadequate. Presentation and delivery are mostly confident and persuasive (where applicable). Presentation and delivery are adequate, with evident lack of confidence and persuasive power (where applicable). Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary ability to evaluate, integrate, and critique a wide range of opinions, beliefs, abstract ideas, and data to inform judgment, identify and solve problems and, where appropriate, propose new hypotheses. Demonstrates sound or accomplished ability to evaluate, integrate, and critique a variety of opinions, beliefs, abstract ideas, and data to inform judgment, identify and solve problems, and, where appropriate, propose new hypotheses. Demonstrates adequate or proficient ability to evaluate, integrate, and critique some opinions, beliefs, abstract ideas, and data to inform judgment, identify and solve problems, and, where appropriate, propose new hypotheses. Shows some weaknesses in evaluation and problem-solving. Demonstrates inadequate or partially proficient ability to evaluate, integrate, and critique some opinions, beliefs, abstract ideas, and data to inform judgment, identify and solve problems, and, where appropriate, propose new hypotheses. Shows many weaknesses in evaluation and problem-solving. Demonstrates unacceptable ability to evaluate, integrate, and critique opinions, beliefs, abstract ideas, and data to inform judgment, identify and solve problems, and, where appropriate, propose new hypotheses. Shows pervasive weaknesses in evaluation and problem-solving. Demonstrates outstanding selection and use of high quality, credible, and relevant sources to develop ideas that are appropriate to the assignment. Demonstrates sound selection and use of credible, relevant sources to support ideas that are appropriate to the assignment. Demonstrates adequate selection and use of credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas that are appropriate to the assignment. Demonstrates inadequate selection and use of sources to support ideas in the assignment. Demonstrates unacceptable selection and use of sources to support ideas in the assignment. Sources are generally cited according to required Sources are cited according to required documentation (e.g., Sources are inconsistently cited according to required documentation (e.g., APA), with frequent Sources are not cited according to required documentation (e.g., APA). Sources are consistently cited 2 Format is inadequate and obscures meaning. Presentation and delivery are inadequate, lacking confidence and persuasive power (where applicable). Presentation and delivery are unacceptable, with little or no confidence and persuasive power (where applicable). Criteria Exemplary (A)) according to required documentation (e.g., APA), with almost no errors. Accomplished (B) documentation (e.g., APA), with few errors. 3 Proficient (C) APA), with some errors. Partially Proficient (D) errors. Unacceptable (F)