Help!

QUESTION 27 How did Jakarta's residents typically circumvent the 3-in-1 high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) policy in the city? O A. Drivers simply paid bribes to law enforcement officials when they were caught violating the HOV lane policy. O B. Because the cost of paying a fine for non-compliance was high relative to a low-income wage, before individuals took the HOV lane, they picked up jockeys paid for their time while they were on the HOV lane. O C. The HOV lane policy was just never properly enforced, so people routinely drove on the roads with less than 3 people. O D. Individuals just took alternative routes, so traffic on the HOV lane was very low. QUESTION 28 What happened to traffic when Jakarta's government lifted the 3-in-1 high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) policy on important roads in the city? O A. Traffic conditions worsened, but only on the roads directly impacted by the 3-in-1 policy. O B. Traffic conditions improved, because more people carpooled in response to a stricter 3-in-1 policy. O C. Traffic conditions worsened throughout the city, even on unaffected roads. O D. Traffic conditions did not change, because the 3-in-1 policy was seldom enforced