Here is a case that is little more challenging. We got not the crime act. A definition of manslaughter. It is blameworthy killing of a human being . It is not mureder as you don't have intention to kill them. It is less than murder but still blame worthy. Homicide - is killing of a human being by another. Q i put can a company commit manslaughter? Just interpreting those two half sentences. Its interesting If they said the killing of a person by another that is just too odd. As interpretation act or the leg act now does define person broadly. But we end up with situation where people getting companies. So has to be human being. When you say another it has to be another human being to make sense. So that rewrtite simplified