Hi, Could you please explain these tables for me and how the attitudes of the respondents should be used to develop a marketing campaign that could result in a more positive attitude towards hunting because of its impact on the environment and animal welfare.

Group Statistics Std. What is your gender IN Mean Deviation I support people's right to hunt wild animals for Male 107 2.59 1.149 sport? Female 232 2.13 .827 Hunting is inhumane Male and should not allowed 109 3.26 1.134 in modern society Female 232 3.53 989 Hunting damages the Male 109 3.22 1.057 environment Female 232 3.33 1.051 Hunting results in wildlife population Male 109 3.35 1.117 declines Female 232 3.56 1.047 Hunting is a more Male humane method for 109 2.89 1.108 people to get meat than farmed animals Female 232 2.38 1.090 I would support a ban Male 109 on the hunting of trophy 3.95 1.228 animals (like lions) Female 230 3.92 1.205Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means F Sig. (2- Sig. t df tailed) I support people's right to hunt wild animals for Equal variances 26.088 assumed .000 4.181 337 000 sport? Equal variances not assumed 3.716 156.608 .000 Hunting is inhumane Equal variances and should not allowed 6.282 assumed .013 -2.233 339 .026 in modern society Equal variances not -2.126 187.778 assumed .035 Hunting damages the Equal variances .485 environment 487 -.878 assumed 339 .380 Equal variances not assumed -.877 210.347 .382 Hunting results in Equal variances wildlife population .594 .441 -1.704 339 assumed 089 declines Equal variances not assumed -1.665 199.634 .097 Hunting is a more Equal variances humane method for .202 .654 assumed 4.011 339 000 people to get meat than farmed animals Equal variances not assumed 3.988 208.390 .000 I would support a ban Equal variances on the hunting of trophy 1.693 194 assumed 230 337 818 animals (like lions) Equal variances not assumed .228 208.647 .820