Hiller is hired by a company, Tote Dat Cart (TDC), to deliver packages. He sets his own hours, pays his own insurance, and handles all matters related to taxes for his work. Hiller drives his own truck, which is used mainly for TDC's deliveries. Hiller is paid for each delivered package, not at an hourly rate. To maximize his efficiency, Hiller on his own invents a shrink ray so he can carry more packages. TDC hears about this invention and claims ownership of it because, TDC claims, Hiller is TDC's employee. Hiller refuses to concede the ownership to TDC; and TDC seeks an injunction against Hiller to, in effect, have the court declare that TDC owns the invention. Which of the following is the most likely outcome and the strongest reason? O The injunction will be granted because of the Shop Rights Doctrine. O The injunction will be granted because Hiller uses the shrink ray while delivering for TDC. O The injunction will be denied because Hiller did not use TDC property or time to create the shrink ray. O The injunction will be granted under common law standards. O The injunction will be denied because Hiller thought of the idea first