HINT: Don't forget about the derived rules, substitution rules and subderivation rules.

1. A ~(C v D)

2. ~A v D~A

In the space provided, derive the conclusion shown from the premises given. All rules and strategies from Chapters 5 & 6 are available. You should copy-and-paste the premises into the response box and then fill in the missing steps.

HINT: Don't forget about the derived rules, substitution rules and subderivation rules.

1. A C

2. ~(D v A) B ~(C v B) (D ~A)

In the space provided, derive the conclusion shown from the premises given. All rules and strategies from Chapters 5 & 6 are available. You should copy-and-paste the premises into the response box and then fill in the missing steps.

HINT: Don't forget about the derived rules, substitution rules and subderivation rules.

1. ~A C

2. C (~D v ~C)

3. ~A DA

In the space provided, derive the conclusion shown from the premises given. All rules and strategies from Chapters 5 & 6 are available. You should copy-and-paste the premises into the response box and then fill in the missing steps.

HINT: Don't forget about the derived rules, substitution rules and subderivation rules.

1. (B v C)

2. A (D E)B D

In the space provided below, translate the following valid argument into SL and construct a proof for it.

Either Donald Trump will be removed from office, or Special Prosecutor Mueller will be fired. If the American people rise to Trump's defense, though, then Donald Trump won't be removed from office. Therefore, if the American people rise to Trump's defense,Special Prosecutor Mueller will be fired.

QUESTION 25

1. In the space provided below, translate the following valid argument into SL and construct a proof for it.

If Austin didn't kick the shortstop with his spikes, then the pitcher wouldn't have hit Austin with a pitch. And if the pitcher hadn't hit Austin with a pitch, then the bench-clearing brawl wouldn't have happened. But the bench-clearing brawl did happen. So, Austin must've kicked the shortstop with his spikes.