How is the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of $2000($ RLUIPA $)$ ?legal if the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of $1993($ RFRA $)$ ?is not?

The $2000$ ?Act restricts regulation on the basis of funding, rather than outright like the $1993$ ?Act.

The Supreme Court precedent changed between $1993$ ?and $2000.$

The $2000$ ?Act is not legally permissible.