However, the process of the government "bailing out" a business is subject to much debate.

Is the moral hazard that was created when the federal government bailed out those firms that made bad investment decisions benefiting those firms and, in effect, penalizing firms who played by the rules?

Do some firms make risky investments knowing that they are "too big to fail" and that, therefore, the government will step in and save them?

Give a reason or example to support your view and why your view makes sense. Cite two different sources, using MLA format, supporting the example you gave.